MYTECHLEARN · ENGINEERING EVIDENCE
Sample Automotive Engineering Deliverables
Understand the structure and purpose of DFMEA, DVP&R, GD&T and ECR/ECN records through original, illustrative training examples.
ILLUSTRATIVE TEMPLATES
Four core engineering records
Examples are simplified for learning. Real programme records must follow the applicable OEM/customer format, controlled revisions and approved sign-off process.
1. DFMEA — sample structure
Recommended fields include item/function, requirement, failure effect, failure mode, failure cause, current prevention controls, current detection controls, team risk assessment, action priority, recommended action, owner, due date and action results.
| Item / Function | Failure mode | Effect | Cause | Action concept |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Door latch mounting interface | Position shifts under load | Engagement/closure function may be affected | Local stiffness or joint variation | Review load assumptions, mounting stiffness, interface tolerances and verification coverage |
Do not copy generic risk ratings. Use the current AIAG & VDA FMEA method and customer-specific requirements.
2. DVP&R — sample structure
| Req. ID | Requirement | Method | Acceptance criteria | Result / evidence | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CL-VER-01 | Door seal water-ingress performance | Controlled water-spray test | Programme-approved limit | Record sample, revision, conditions, photos and report ID | Planned — illustrative |
| CL-VER-02 | Latch operating function | Cycle and functional test | Approved force, engagement and durability limits | Record measured data and deviations | Planned — illustrative |
Track requirement coverage, test sample configuration, equipment calibration, deviations, retest and final disposition.
3. GD&T — sample drawing interpretation
Illustrative bracket locating concept: identify a functional primary mounting face as datum A, a locating hole as datum B and a secondary locating feature as datum C. Apply geometric controls only after reviewing the actual functional relationships and the governing drawing standard.
- Confirm datum features represent assembly location.
- Check the tolerance zone and material-condition modifiers against function.
- Ensure inspection setup simulates the specified datum reference frame.
- Record the standard and revision used by the programme.
This page does not reproduce a complete controlled drawing or prescribe a universal feature-control-frame value.
4. ECR / ECN — sample change record
| Record stage | Typical information |
|---|---|
| ECR — request | Problem statement, proposed change, reason, affected part/revision, evidence and originator. |
| Impact analysis | Function, interfaces, mass/cost, tooling, manufacturing, quality, DFMEA, DVP&R, inventory and service impact. |
| Approval | Required engineering, quality, manufacturing, supplier and programme approvals. |
| ECN — implementation | Approved revision, effectivity, implementation timing, obsolete stock disposition and closure evidence. |
COMMON QUESTIONS
Frequently asked questions
Answers about sample deliverables and what good technical evidence looks like.
What do the sample deliverables illustrate?
The expected structure and depth of engineering documentation: problem definition, analysis, recommendation and residual issues—not finished production drawings.
Should my own portfolio look exactly like the samples?
Use them as a quality and structure reference. Your content must be original and matched to the components or systems you actually studied.
How much visual material versus written reasoning is expected?
Both. Visuals help orientation; the written reasoning shows whether you understand function, constraints and trade-offs. Neither alone is sufficient.
Is it acceptable to show intermediate or incomplete work?
Yes, when it demonstrates learning. Briefly explaining why an approach was abandoned often reveals stronger judgement than only presenting the final option.
How are samples kept free of confidential content?
By using generalised geometry, public principles and educational framing. The same discipline must be applied to every piece you publish or show in interviews.